Why Buy and Hold Investing Is Simple, But Not Easy

My Money Blog:

The strategy of Buy & Hold Investing has a lot of followers (including me), and one of it’s touted benefits is that it is a simple way to invest. In the case of passive investors, it primarily involves picking and maintaining an asset allocation plan for the next 10-50 years of your life. No need to monitor stock prices or decipher financial statements. However, “simple” and “easy to execute” aren’t the same thing. For example, “spend less than you earn” is simple. “Always save for a rainy day” is simple. But how many people actually do this?

altext

So why don’t I think it will be easy?
The picture above is the cover of the August 1979 issue of BusinessWeek magazine. In case you can’t make it out, the picture is of a stock certificate folded into a paper airplane that has crashed, surrounded by many other crumpled airplanes. (No Photoshop back then…)

The title of the cover story is “The death of equities: How inflation is destroying the stock market.” I haven’t been able to find the full text of the article noted, but I did find some snippets at TheFiendBear. He notes that the article “was published at a time when the Dow was languishing at 875 and had been trading in a see-saw fashion ever since topping out 6 1/2 years earlier in January of 1973. Inflation was a persistent nag on the economy and the Federal Reserve and US fiscal policies were held in low regard.“

Sound familiar?…

Should you buy earthquake insurance?

WalletPop:

Filed under: Home, Insurance, Real Estate

After a 5.4 magnitude earthquake shook southern Illinois this morning, I wondered what would happen if my home were caught in a strong tremor. Like most people, my home insurance doesn’t cover such an eventuality. Ohio is in blue on the U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program map of earthquake risk, so I probably won’t go shopping for coverage.

Earthquake insurance is available, though. Usually sold with a large deductible, the coverage might be a good investment for those in highly vulnerable areas. Of course, the higher the risk, the higher the premium. Californians are assured that coverage is available thanks to the creation of the California Earthquake Authority The CERA points out that there is no part of the state that is immune from earthquakes.

“For many California homeowners, their home is their biggest financial asset,” The CERA says on its Web site. “Without earthquake insurance, how do you plan to protect that asset from the costs of earthquake damage?”

But earthquakes aren’t just a California problem. The Insurance Information Institute (III) points out that since 1900 these geological events have occurred in 39 states and been felt in all 50.

“Earthquake insurance carries a deductible, generally in the form of a percentage rather than a dollar amount. Deductibles can range anywhere from 2 percent to 20 percent of the replacement value of the structure,” The III says on its Web site. “Insurers in states like Washington, Nevada and Utah, with higher than average risk of…